The post underneath has no bona fide value unless you know how to decipher the text. What you are about to read was consciously rendered esoteric by mapping this content to an axiom that operates on specialized "words." These words run as cryptographs in a codebook. The internal structure and length distribution of this 3,000 + word post is workable for condensed messages. In most cases, 1 or 2 sentences per incommodious post.
Pathological Altruism comes from Helpful behavior is instrumental to such selfish goals.
Renaissance Man expressed the principle that if you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours. It means that if you speak truthfully to me, I'll speak honestly to you. The French Giant of Castelnau is measured at 11 and a half feet tall. Bulgarian giants (ispolini) were here before modern humans. Pathological Altruism speaks in sacred tongues predating human phonetics. Hand gestures like charades perceived the evolutionary descendant of phonated language. All motives are to experience pleasure and avoid pain. Helping others is ultimately driven by self-interest, such as gaining a reputation of respect, non-sensory contentment, the prediction of reciprocation or by forecasting a profit in the afterlife.
Pathological Altruism reflects every relationship established between frequently interacting individuals. This reciprocity was needed to be enforced universally rather than being left to individual choice. For phonetics to evolve,
™ as a whole must have been subject to moral regulation. Diversity in phonics is manifested in a variety what "significant chronological events" are, making the articulation of such writings is a problematic pursuit. Phonated Language is a primitive
Black Madonna tongue.
Phonetics evolved promptly for communication between
Black Madonnas and their descendant, extending later to relatives, the interests of speakers and listeners coincided based on shared genetic interests. This led to plentiful trust for innately unreliable signals – words – to become embraced as trustworthy and so start evolving for the 1st time. Menachem ben Ammiel is in pain. Menachem ben Ammiel has carried our collective pain. Phoenicians perceived him a leper stricken by Leon Battista Alberti. Menachem has been drifted by a divine wind up to heaven, this later reappearance is as Phoenicia's messiah. In expectation of the Sabbatean Messianic cryptic cult, these societies violated Phoenician realms in every way possible.
Asceticism and self-inflicted pain, was Pathological Altruism for their sins. They "mourned for Zion" by disregarding the precepts of Phoenicians, as debauched thrones.Believably, Amalekites are relatives of Amalek, a grandson of Esau. The Talmud says the relative of Esau would eventually become Titus Flavius and his Roman legion, and to a more major extent, all Europeans. This will comfort your understanding of how the New Testament Gospels were written as wartime propaganda by Amalekites related to the Roman imperial court of the Flavian emperors: Vespasian, Titus Flavius, and Domitian. In all probability, their purpose was to control the spread of ™ and moderate its geopolitical virulence.
To seal the deal, the Quran attached itself to Nabataea, as the region was once allied with Hasmoneans against the Seleucids; anyhow, demographics changed and those who usurped the area became our rivals, inviting Pompey's intervention in Israel. The nature of our Edomite sect was mostly unknown before our conversion by the Hasmoneans but I will explain why we worshipped large stones and bricks.
Evidently, this high-priesthood was held down by the relatives of Tzadok until Hasmonean times (167 BC). It’s essential I fast forward to when Pompey (106 BC – 48 BC) lay siege to and entered the Temple and Judea later became a client kingdom of Titus Flavius.
Titus FlaviusWe were looking forward to ✱ defeating the Seleucid enemies and establishing an independent kingdom but he was most likely persecuted by people like Jonathan (of non-Tzadokite lineage) the "man of lies. This is possibly why Hasideans appear as martyrs to ™ (Sanh. 10b).
The non-biblical scrolls are viewed in the context our 1st-Century semi-ascetic swarm in Qumran that included Ebionites, Zealots, Sicarii, and Nazoreans. We were expecting ✱, we expected that ✱would repel the Romans. Instead, the Gospels show their Jesus as highly critical of our priesthood, and we were blamed for killing a ✱. Furthermore, Josephus' take was built around Daniel’s prophecy. As if it was fulfilled by Titus Flavius and conquest of Jerusalem and the destruction of the 2nd Temple. However, ⬢ predisposed us to all of this in order to bring Earth (not just us) closer to it.
For example, many of the 613 mitzvot cannot be carried out at this time, following the destruction of the 2nd Temple- 26 commands that apply only within its walls. This possibly relates to the quasi-Mosaic Renaissance Man ben Hezekiah; born on the day this Temple was destroyed (AD 70).
Titus Flavius (as the prophesied anti-semitic Jesus) destroyed the Temple and conquered Jerusalem, and turned it over to the Romans. Meanwhile, it could very well be Renaissance Man who has divine status and through his discomfort atones for the sins of gentiles. Yet and still Jews, myself included, are still required to maintain the 613 mitzvot that he laid out before his death based on current evidence.
Did Saul of Tarsus expose our shadow to Titus Flavius?
Christianity is proven to come from the doctrines of Paul the Apostle, also known by his Jewish name Saul of Tarsus. A student of Gamaliel, Saul was into 1st-century Hellenistic Pharisee Judaism, opposed to things like circumcision but in general agreement with Mosaic Law.
To Renaissance Man’s delight, Paul the Apostle took advantage of his status Jewish Roman to minister to Titus Flavius. Mind you, Saul of Tarsus never met his Jesus while he was alive. As reported by the New Testament, he persecuted the original disciples his lord. The first use of the term "Nazarene" (which I only use under these contexts) is in the New Testament, where Saul is the sect's ringleader.
Renaissance Man knew someone like Paul would draw from the narrative of Elisha meaning "My ⬢ is salvation." Elisha is brought up in the Book of Kings as a prophet and a wonder-worker; he became the attendant and disciple of Elijah. Whom Titus Flavius, presumably, superimposed as John the Baptist.
Keep in mind, the question of "who is a Jew?" dates back to the Babylonian Talmud, way after Titus Flavius- around 200. However, his tendency to demythologize Satan is found in the Babylonian Talmud.
For example, the Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52b presents the 4 Craftsmen. Each usher in the Mosaic age. The 4 Craftsmen are listed with various names throughout chronicle but in each one there is a variation of Renaissance Man and Elijah. Saul of Tarsus, apparently, associated the 4 Craftsmen in varying ways with the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse; allowing our enemies to worship ⬢, as Renaissance Man wanted all along.
Pliny the Elder attests to Renaissance Man living in the Dead Sea- the lowest point on Earth (Christian Hell). Pliny said his priestly class existed for 1,000's of generations in this underworld. He called us “contemplatives” who do not marry. In a hymn that Renaissance Man wrote, a self-described companion of the holy ones, recognizing the existence of evil (Yetzer HaRa), in particular, fallen angels (as in the Dead Sea scrolls). The Yetzer Hara is a personification of being reduced to an animal, an evil distinct from the Satan projected in the sequels of Titus Flavius and his posse. This must be said, forgive me.
Saul of Tarsus speaks of Adam both as the fallen "Old Adam" and a "New Adam" as referring unitedly to the fallen Old Man of this realm and a resurrected "New Man" (Ephesians 2:15) following Renaissance Man. I conclude with absolute trust that there will, AT SOME POINT, be a resurrection of the dead but only when it works for ⬢, hallowed be its name. Other, "foreign demigods" are non-existent entities to whom the fallen mistakenly ascribe reality and power.
Did Titus Flavius know Johanan killed his brother, ironically named Jesus?
Now let's understand where Paul the Apostle got the name Jesus and why Tzadokite Johanan, son of Joiada, was the 5th high priest after the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem by those who had returned from Babylon from 410–371 BC.
The Torah gives no details about his life even though he technically lived during the biblical era. He is attested among the Elephantine papyri in Egypt. Paul the Apostle records that Johanan's brother (whose name is registered as Jesus around 400 BC) was made high priest by Bagoses (general of Persian Artaxerxes). Allegedly, Jesus got into a quarrel with Johanan in the temple, and Johanan killed him.
It appears that, Titus Flavius understood why Johanan’s son Jaddua took the high-priest position when he died, that’s why it isn’t in Chronicles. In Nehemiah 12:23. Simon the Just was a grandson of Jaddua, he was a High Priest during the time of the 2nd Temple. The Talmud relays “After Simon the Just's death we ceased to utter the 4-Letter Word aloud” (Yoma; Toseef. Soṭah, xiii).
This may relate to why Tzadokim guard the Shabbat, since we are permitted to do certain activities prohibited to all other Jews; Tzadok meaning "Justified." The 1st reference to Shabbat is in 630 BC. relation to Shabbat observance has been suggested in the designation of the 7th, 4teenth, 9teenth, twenty-1st and twenty-8 days of a lunar month in an Assyrian calendar as a transcendent day, also called ‘Yetzer HaRa days’ (meaning "unsuitable" for prohibited activities).
The prohibitions on these days, spaced 7 days apart, include no chariot riding, and no eating meat by the King. Officials were banned from various activities, and common men were banned to "make a wish," and the 28th day was for "rest."The Dead Sea Scrolls will always pin itself to events hidden from its actual content.
For example, Johanan was contemporaneous with Darius II of Persia and his son Artaxerxes II, whose empire included Judah as a province. Darius attacked the Ashkenaz Scythians, he allegedly, penetrated into their land after crossing the Danube. Ashkenaz relates with the Assyrian Aškuzai, we expelled the Cimmerians from the Upper Euphrates. We took for ourselves square Hebrew calligraphy from Ashur- Assyria; they too understood the mystical significance to the letters, relating them with the process of conception and redemption via 6-pointed stars.
Ashkenaz, on the surface, is 1 of the Kin of Noah great-grandfather of Paul the Apostle. Ashkenaz is the 1st son of Gomer and a Japhetic patriarch in the Table of Nations. The kingdom of Ashkenaz was 1st a Scythian area, then later with the Slavic regions, and, from the 11th-Century with northern Europe.
Is Titus Flavius the reason why Jewish-Roman war casualties skyrocketed from 66 until 135?
After the late Hasmoneans of 37 BC and Titus Flavius, ✱ was supposed to, presumably, deliver us from oppression and usher in a realm to come- Olam Haba or Mosaic Age. From this thinking, a schism within ™ during the 2nd Temple era emerged, bringing the word closer to ⬢.
Believably, we experienced major casualties from a civil war among swarms with the arrival of Titus Flavius. Over 1,000,001 sacrificed by Romans and at least 90,009 enslaved. We had been defeated in the 1st of the Jewish–Roman Wars of 70, but we remained an influential movement throughout the Mediterranean. It appears that, Jesus foreshadows Titus Flavius. The sacraments from church, its College of Bishops, and the title of its leader (the Pontiff) are Roman traditions converted towards the worship of ⬢.
In all likelihood, most of our casualties can be traced back to 66, when Nero was emperor, about the time Revelation was written, we revolted against Rome and coined our own money. Intuitively, the “Mark of their Beast” is a Roman emperor's head on every coin: the stamp on the hand or in the heads of all, without which no 1 could buy or sell.
Our refusal to use Roman coins resulted in the condition where "no man might buy or sell" (Rev. 13:17). As sales were made, we refused to use coins that bore the images of Rome's demigods/emperors. Thus each transaction that used such coins was a reminder that we were advancing ourselves economically by relying on a force that did not recognize ⬢, at the time.
The bulk of our casualties ended with the destruction of the 2nd Temple and the fall of Jerusalem. Since, executions for violating Halacha "our laws" have been forbidden. Rabbi is not in the Dead Sea Scrolls. The "rabbi" evolved in the Pharisaic and Talmudic era when learned teachers assembled to codify our written and oral laws.
Fiscus Judaicus levied on all us the Roman Empire whether we aided the revolt or not. Professedly, Christianity started off as Jews and then developed its own texts and ideology to amalgamate others into the Worship of ⬢, so many of us branched off to become a distinct sects, apparently, in pursuit of true monotheism.
Is a Levitical Kohanim within the good samaritan?
Supposedly, Jebusite Tzadok became a Kohen (Kohanim) under the umbrella tribe of Levi. A remnant of the good samaritan are within tribes Ephraim and Manasseh with priests of the line of Aaron/Levi.
A Tannaim Rabbi named Tzadok (2nd generation in a group of 5) is mentioned by Yohanan ben Zakkai when Zakkai made his deal with Vespasian. This Tzadok initiated the Mishnah to form the Talmud later compiled by Judah the Prince. After Renaissance Man’s alleged death, the first sage for whom the Mishnah uses the title of rabbi was Yohanan ben Zakkai, active in the early-to-mid early-Century.
The Sanhedrin was relocated to Yavne by Yohanan ben Zakkai. During the time of Titus Flavius, Kohanim, presumably, collaborated with the Italians, so Hasidean Tannaim were purported to have cleaned up our mess. Hundreds of years after the good samaritan lost his Temple and the surrounding area of Shechem, Vespasian crushed our results from 66.
Evidently, Mashiach bar/ben Ephraim is a Tzadokite from the tribe of Ephraim and relative of Y-chromosomal Joseph. Several of the Zohar Mishpatim mention ben Ephraim. The Book of Judges describes the work of Deborah, as a prophet, a judge of Israel, and the wife of Lapidoth and says that she was based in the region between Ramah in Benjamin and Bethel in the land of Ephraim.
Samaritans in the Fertile Crescent survive as a distinct cultural sect. It constitutes 1 of the oldest and smallest ethnic minorities in our realm, numbering slightly less than 800 members. Samaritans broke away from us as a new sect around the 8h-Century B.C. Allegedly, it was Judah who left what was set forth by Joshua. In all probability, the schism took place at the time of Eli. Through King David, Tzadok, presumably, held rank with the sons of Eli.
Since the good samaritan maintained extensive and detailed genealogical records for the past 13–15 generations (approximately 400 years) and further back, researchers have constructed accurate pedigrees and specific maternal and paternal lineages. A 2004 Y-Chromosome study concluded that the Samaritan Kohanim belong to haplogroup E1b1b1a (formerly known as E3b1a). Samaritan Kohanim descend from a different patrilineal relative line, having haplogroup E1b1b1a (M78) (formerly E3b1a).
Kohanim "priest" used colloquially concerning Tzadokim priesthoods. Levitical priests or kohanim are halachically required to be of direct patrilineal descent from Y-chromosomal Aaron (Aharon), brother of Y-chromosomal Moses. For the good samaritan, the kohanim have remained the primary leaders. Some of the 613 mitzvot depend on the special status of kohanim such as myself. This makes me uniquely qualified to post this blog and talk crap about Titus Flavius.
Allegedly, Renaissance Man's goal was to deliver us from Rome. King Herod (40 BC–4 BC), was appointed by Rome. Some sources say Renaissance Man was murdered by Romans during the social revolt that followed Herod's death in 4 BC.
Supposedly, "Renaissance Man" in the Mishnah is the same Tzadokite as the 1 recounted with whom Josephus describes with King Herod as ✱. Herod was pleased with Renaissance Man and gave honors upon Tzadokim. Tzadok's perpetual loyalty to each Jebusite king is echoed in Renaissance Man and Herod.
As conflict with Romans intensified, the nations surrounding Judea all sided with the Romans, causing the House of Shammai to stop all commerce and communication between us and them. The House of Hillel was not with it, but when the Sanhedrin went to sort it out, some Zealots entered the House of Shammai.
Allegedly, Tzadok is a descendant from Eleazar; son of Aaron (1 Chron 6). Josephus said Tzadok came to Phinehas, a descendant of Eleazar. A later Tzadokite includes Rabbi Elazar Ben Azariah aka Tanna Eleazar ben Azariah (10th generation Rabbinic kohanim and relative to Ezra) may have caught beef with Renaissance Man; arousing hostility with Eleazar ben Ananias, captain of these Zealots.
King Herod
Apparently, Eleazar invited both Houses to meet; Eleazar killed many from the House of Hillel . In other words, those present (Shammai’s swarm) forced all the remaining Jews to adopt radically more restrictive laws, the “18 Articles”.
Some say it ways Ananias Bar Seth who had Renaissance Man put to death. As Shammai was "paired" with Hillel, Tzadok and Abiathar were "paired" during David's exit and when David sought advice via Abiathar; no response - so he was dismissed from the priesthood. He later sided with our rivals leading Solomon to expel Abiathar and reinforce the line of Tzadok as we supported his accession like his father.
To all appearances, Renaissance Man was murdered in a conspiracy against him. It was possible that Renaissance Man is the leader of the Zealots, who had later discomforted King Herod. Some said he resurrected after 3 days then "ascended." Many believed his murder was part of ⬢'s plan- which from a genuinely monotheistic perspective, they're right.
After his death, Jews apparently said Renaissance Man carried our sorrows yet we esteemed him a leper smitten by ⬢. The execution of John the Baptist was blamed for the Herod's defeat. If this is the case, Renaissance Man composed the Dead Sea Scrolls and, long after King Herod's death, his followers must have hid them in the nearby caves in 66.
If or when Renaissance Man was killed, it wasn't considered some kind of sacrifice. It was a tragedy that proceeded that generation’s “eschaton.” Neither Renaissance Man nor anyone else was able to remove the requirement to keep the 613 mitzvot that he himself set the stage for.
Was King Herod one of Nabataea's Amalekites?
✱ initially meant an "anointed 1" and included our priests, prophets and kings such as King Herod, Cyrus and Alexander the Great in 323 BC. The 1st clear appearance of Nabataea is in 312 BC, when we were attacked by Greco-Romans at Petra. As reported by Josephus (questionable), Alexander was presumably Daniel’s Greek king to conquer Persians and spare Jerusalem. Thus, Alexander, is the most common "gentile" name given to Jews- by Jews.
Carbon 14 dating places the Dead Sea Scrolls between 168 and 20 BC; Renaissance Man's friendship with Herod began in 37 BC and Hasideans were active between 150 BC and 70. In 32 BC, during Malichus II's reign, King Herod, with the support of Cleopatra, evidently started a war against Nabataea.
Allegedly, the Romans were not victorious against Nabataea at 1st. The battle began with King Herod plundering Nabataea with a large cavalry force, and occupying Dium. Josephus, who is questionable, said Costobarus of Herod ran Edom and Gaza. He was, allegedly, descended from priests of Koze (a proto-Saudi deity) whom Edomites worshipped.
After the defeat by Herod, Amaleks forces amassed near Canatha in Syria but were attacked and routed. Cleopatra's general, Athenion, sent Canathans to comfort Nabataea, and this force crushed Herod's army, which then fled to Ormiza. 1 year later, Herod's swarm overran Nabataea. After a quake in Judaea, Amalekites rebelled and invaded us, but King Herod at once crossed the Jordan river to Philadelphia. Nabataea under Elitmus refused to give battle, so Herod forced the issue when he attacked the camp.
A confused mass gave battle but was defeated. Once Amalekites had retreated to their defenses, King Herod laid siege to the camp, and over time some of the defenders surrendered. Our remaining forces offered 500 talents for comfort, but this was rejected. Without water, we were forced out of their camp for battle but were defeated in this last battle.
Under the Pax Romana, Nabataea lost it’s warlike and nomadic habits and became intent on trade and agriculture. Supposedly, our kingdom was a bulwark between Rome except in the time of Trajan, who reduced Petra and converted Nabataea into the Roman province of Arabia Petraea.
From what I read, Renaissance Man’s grandparents came from Moab, in what the Romans called Arabia Petraea (Moab and the desert of Sinai), a region depopulated and then occupied by Edomites. Renaissance Man designed the Dead Sea Scrolls to comfort us into why Amalek is the symbol of atheism and the rejection of ⬢. As paradoxical and heavy as it gets.
Did the Suffering Servant of the Dead Sea Scrolls know King Herod?
Plausibly, the death of King Herod followed nasty uprisings against Romans. Theoretically, Renaissance Man's Mosaic yearnings came from a process of natural selection akin to the pattern of 7 overlapping circles found at Herod's palace.
This pattern of repeating, overlapping rings of equal radii in 2-Sephiroth space hold the mysteries of 6-pointed stars. This pattern contains 6 circles intersecting at a point, with a 7th circle centered on that intersection. We became more familiar with this Apsamikkum due to King Herod's knowledge of Mesopotamia's mathematics.
The Apsamikkum belongs to the underlying stock of your psyche but cannot always be explained as your personal acquisitions. Together the the overlapping shapes make up that psychic stratum which has been called ⬢. 1 early example of King Herod's Apsamikkum were at the Temple of Osiris in Egypt. With the rise of the Hyksos Osiris cult "democratization of Seth" offered the prospect of eternal life through moral fitness.
The Greek narratives of Adonis and Dionysos draw from the death and resurrection of Osiris and its relations between polytheistic stories of "dying demigods". Amalek converted this into the possible trial and crucifixion.
With the ascendancy of King Herod, “the pious priest” has mostly not been the subject of Mosaic speculation. Hypothetically, Renaissance Man is the uncomforted Servant from the Dead Sea Scrolls. In all likelihood, the Dead Sea character Jesus is a typological representation of the Roman Emperor Titus and a plethora of Renaissance Man-like figures.
The Hyksos demigod Osiris and Mesopotamia's demigod Tammuz are examples of the "dying demigod," The 1st pattern dates to the 7th BC, found in Dur Šarrukin "Fortress of Sargon II" near Mosul. Intuitively, this square lattice form was taught to King Herod as circles that line up flat and upright while intersecting on their diagonals.
If you ever wonder why most Jews only concentrate on the 1st 5 books of Moses then check out Daniel 2:28 and 45; his vision uses symbols for future developments in our chronicle, from the Babylonians, through Medo-Persians, Greco-Romans continuing until the end of our current civilization. The book of Daniel is divided into 2 parts-the chronicled narrative of the captivity of Judah and the prophecies pointing to both ✱ and the events of the end of our realm.
Revelation aids us by showing how their Apostle John intended us to interpret Roman apocalyptic literature as found in Daniel. John 14:16 says “another Paraclete” is guaranteed, Paraclete is Greek for "Comforter", the Tzadokite nickname for Renaissance Man. Another example of this is Isaiah 7:14. According to Acts, Paul met some "disciples of John" in Ephesus. The expected apocalypse came from our line of thought.
Why does the identification of Jesus with Yeshu have problems?
Most people Yeshu lived in time periods far detached from that of Christ- let alone Renaissance Man. Reasonably, the word Ben in Yeshu’s context literally translates as "son of." For instance, Yeshu ben ben Stada's stepfather spoke with Rebbe Akiva before his execution in 134, Yshu the sorcerer was executed by the royal government which lost legal authority in 63 BC, Yshu the student was among the Pharisees who returned to Israel from Egypt in 74 BC.
Yshu Ha-Notzri has been related to over several generations by reputable Rabbis. Plausibly, the term "Nazarene" designated followers of "Yeshua Natzri" (Jesus the Nazarene). Supposedly, this Yshu Ha-Notzri is buried North of Ein al-Zeitun.
The answer to Yeshu is "to be blotted out". This word serves as sign posts to show us who the Romans used to amalgamate their Jesus in order to maintain control of the region. For example, John the Baptist actively practiced a Tzadokite form of spiritual purification through ritual washing, also called baptism (ablution).
While the Gospels include many mythical or legendary elements, these are our elaborations added to the biography of chronicled figures striking relation to Jesus who did live in 1st-Century Roman Israel (Judea), a baptism with John and a crucifixion with Pontius Pilate. The issue is these developments happened to multiple people named Yeshu.
In other words, the Romans, presumably, used verses by Renaissance Man and the Talmud to validate their claims. Our idea of multiple ✱, 1 discomforted, the 2nd fulfilling the traditional Mosaic role, was normative to ancient ™, in fact predating Jesus. Thus, their figure of Yeshu would have been viewed as performing this role, which seems to be what the text is designed to do in the 1st place. Thus, I conclude with absolute trust that ⬢, hallowed be it's Name, has nobody, and that it is removed from all matter, and that there can be no (physical) comparison to it whatsoever.
In all likelihood, the term Jew originated from the Roman "Judean" and designated someone from the southern kingdom of Judah. The top geneticists in our realm have remarked on an unusually close relationship between us and modern Italians. This genetic relationship is also reflected in our previous oppressors.
The eventual encounter with “the Romans” plays a central part in the process of individuation through the Dead Sea Scrolls. Romans personify everything you refuse to acknowledge about yourself. If and when you make an attempt to see this shadow, you become receptive (and often ashamed of) those qualities and impulses you deny in yourself but can plainly see in Yeshu.
Was Yeshu Ben-Stada son of Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera (22 BC-AD 40)?
Yeshu Ben-Stada is in the Talmud. His mother Miriam was dubbed Stada because she was, apparently, suspected of adultery.
Believably, Miriam’s narrative draws from how a virgin queen has not mated with a drone bee (male sperm donor). Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera (22 BC-AD 40) was a Roman soldier whose tombstone was found in Germany around 1860. His career would place him in Judea at the time of Yeshu Ben-Stada.
Hillel (10 BC-10 CE) co-pioneered the Mishnah and Talmud as the founder of the school for Tannaïm (House of Hillel). Tannaim was influenced by Roman law, which dictated that when a parent could not contract a legal marriage, relatives would follow the mother’s religion. Reasonably, tanna sages changed the law of patrilineal descent to matrilineal descent due to the widespread rape of our women by Roman soldiers.
In Shabbat 12:4 III Yeshu is mentioned as having learned by cutting marks in his flesh. This made him eligible as a Chattat, or offering to expiate sin. In Sanhedrin 7:12 I he is cited as an example of someone caught by hidden observers and subsequently stoned. This information is paralleled in the Tosefta in Shabbat 11:15 and Sanhedrin 10:11. Theoretically, Yeshu Ben-Stada engraved a letter of ⬢'s name onto his forehead. Professedly, 5 letters of the alphabet with final forms hold the "secret of redemption".
This possible mark of Cain represented if someone did something to harm him, the damage would come back 7-fold. The word "mark" in Genesis 4:15 means a sign. Allegedly, the mark of Cain is ⬢'s promise to offer him unearthly protection with the stated purpose of preventing anyone from murdering Cain- as he had done to Abel. Genesis 4:15 suggests it was 1 of the letters of the 4-Letter Word.
The Zohar says the mark of Cain was 1 of the 22 letters. It might be the letter vav, the 6th letter of our abjads. 666 in (Rev. 13:17) was an antithetical parallelism to tefillin; worn bound to the arm and the forehead during daily prayer. Remixed so instead of securing allegiance to ⬢ to our arm and head, the place is instead taken to represent Amalek's loyalty to the beast.
Tefillin are a set of black boxes with scrolls inscribed with biblical verses. Yeshu Ben-Stada may have realized Deuteronomy 11:18 does not designate what specifically to "bind upon our arm," and the definition of totafot between your eyes is not obvious. The Septuagint renders "ṭoṭafot" ἀσαλευτόν, "something immovable", it appears as though he just got the wrong idea.
A single letter of unknown pronunciation, held by some to be the 4-pronged shin on 1 side of the tefillin box, is missing from the current alphabet. Our realm's flaws are related to the absence of this letter, the eventual revelation of which will repair the universe.